Release decision report

Fictional sample. Every metric, status, organization, and decision on this page exists only to demonstrate the report engine; replace it with verified project evidence before use.

This starter organizes a real review: the decision, the evidence behind it, the remaining risk, and the next accountable steps. Replace the sample facts while keeping the semantic structure.

Decision signal

Verified findings

Signal Evidence State
Authoring contract Registry and schema checks Confirmed
Portable output Desktop and mobile file:// journeys Confirmed
Package boundary Clean-consumer installation Confirmed
External release Explicitly outside this report Not started

The table separates observed facts from work that has not happened. Keep that distinction when replacing the sample content.

Evidence map

Evidence moving from source through verification to a release decision

Download the evidence map

Scope

The candidate includes the declarative authoring loop, static output, and package-owned interactions.

Confidence

Focused unit, browser, and installed-package journeys cover the public path.

Boundary

Publication and deployment remain separate external actions.

Decision and review

Accept the candidate for release preparation

The evidence supports advancing. Any new blocking observation reopens this decision with a reproducible failure, owner, and next check.

Evidence trailFour accountable phases turn declarative source into a reviewed release decision.
  1. State the decision

    Record the audience, scope, and success criteria in ordinary Markdown.

  2. Replace the sample

    Keep the structure and replace every demonstration claim with observed evidence.

  3. Create the artifact

    Generate the portable page in the selected output format.

  4. Review the result

    Open the built file and record the decision against observed evidence.

Review detail

Open the residual-risk register
  • Large embedded assets can exceed the configured warning threshold.
  • External publication still requires an explicit release action.
  • New requirements need their own evidence before they enter this decision.

Next actions

Complete the handoff

  1. Replace the sample findings with verified project facts.
  2. Build the selected output; build validates the source before writing it.
  3. Open the result directly in a browser and review the real page.
  4. Use validate or inspect only when you need focused diagnostics, then assign owners and dates.

Review confidence

Use this bounded control during a live review to count independently confirmed evidence groups.

1

Review workspace

Review this report

No discussion threads yet